zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. efdee+(OP)[view] [source] 2022-10-17 08:21:06
Claiming Github's Copilot is Microsoft's "Extinguish" step against open source _is_ the mental gymnastics.
replies(2): >>carom+ol >>sngz+jn1
◧
2. carom+ol[view] [source] 2022-10-17 11:52:26
>>efdee+(OP)
It really isn't mental gymnastic. Copilot, the model, is a program that is a derivative work of open source code. It should be open source.
replies(1): >>efdee+YF1
◧
3. sngz+jn1[view] [source] 2022-10-17 16:52:04
>>efdee+(OP)
there it is
◧◩
4. efdee+YF1[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-10-17 18:02:43
>>carom+ol
That is another discussion. He is not claiming that it should be open source - he is claiming it is created to destroy open source.
replies(2): >>sngz+WI1 >>carom+oA2
◧◩◪
5. sngz+WI1[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-10-17 18:20:35
>>efdee+YF1
I didn't claim such a thing, my claim is Microsoft's purchase of Github is not good for open source.
◧◩◪
6. carom+oA2[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-10-17 23:28:30
>>efdee+YF1
He is me. Allowing large companies to ignore licenses and giving them a tool to launder licensed code at scale is a significant threat to the integrity of open source licenses.
[go to top]