zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. averev+(OP)[view] [source] 2022-10-17 05:49:54
Not really, unless you can produce a verbatim copy of existing artwork out of stability's stable diffusion.
replies(1): >>averev+4q1
2. averev+4q1[view] [source] 2022-10-17 16:10:36
>>averev+(OP)
"I cannot produce proof but I dislike the argument, so I must downvote" - the HN community being the rational actor that it always is
replies(1): >>vrndli+Yx2
◧◩
3. vrndli+Yx2[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-10-17 21:46:13
>>averev+4q1
> Lawmakers need to jump on this stuff ASAP

Maybe not as soon as possible, probably a lot of other problems that need immediate attention.

But some attention maybe? Nobody likes it if someone does a repost of a post, but some reposting could be seen as going "viral" so as a creator you're cool with it. If someone else does the whole going "viral" with your work, maybe it's less cool.

In spirit of the thread, if co-pilot generates some code to create a stable diffusion prompt explicitly for "Greg Rutkowski" art and it writes code your friend wrote for a small gig, well can you re-use his code for your own gig?

Can "Greg" even claim it was his art in your opininion, even though it's probably not a verbatim copy

[go to top]