zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. soulof+(OP)[view] [source] 2022-10-17 01:19:02
Your response is much appreciated. The dust will settle eventually, it seems distrust is the de facto way which people interpret new technologies.
replies(1): >>binary+h
◧
2. binary+h[view] [source] 2022-10-17 01:22:12
>>soulof+(OP)
IMO someone should be responding to the Twitter thread itself. I’m not sure why the official response is here when the copyright owner raised the complaint on Twitter.
replies(1): >>_ryanj+l2
◧◩
3. _ryanj+l2[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-10-17 01:45:22
>>binary+h
Good call. Done. https://twitter.com/docsparse/status/1581461734665367554?s=4...
replies(1): >>Thorre+n7
◧◩◪
4. Thorre+n7[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-10-17 02:34:52
>>_ryanj+l2
It looks like you linked to the original, not the reply. There are so many replies to the original tweet that it's hard to find any specific reply.
replies(1): >>pabs3+x9
◧◩◪◨
5. pabs3+x9[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-10-17 03:02:01
>>Thorre+n7
The replies appear to be here:

https://nitter.net/ryanjsalva/with_replies

[go to top]