zlacker

> With stable diffusion it's much closer to someone remixing and aping the images than it is reproducing originals.

So very similar to how the music industry treats sampling then?

Everybody using CoPilot needs to get "code sample clearance" from the original copyright holder before publishing their remix or new program that uses snippets of somebody else's code...

Try explaining _that_ to your boss and legal department.

"To: <all software dev> Effective immediately, any use of Github is forbidden without prior written approval from both the CTO and General Councel."

>>bigiai+(OP)
This is already a problem with anyone who ever copypastes from Stack Overflow. You're all violating CC-BY-SA[0] and nobody really cares about this.

[0] https://stackoverflow.com/help/licensing

>>kmeist+66
If I ever take any code from SO, I include a comment with a link to it. Surely that's standard practice for anything longer than a line or two?

>>bscphi+X9
I do the same. I think it satisfies BY (attribution) but not SA (Share Alike).

As GP says, no one really cares, but it seems hard to satisfy SA... even if you are pasting into open source, is your license compatible with CC?

Perhaps I'm over-thinking this.