zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. crummy+(OP)[view] [source] 2022-10-17 00:42:37
In my opinion Copilot helps with the easy, boring stuff by typing what I likely would have typed anyway. The harder the code to write, the less likely I'd be to lean on Copilot.
replies(2): >>JChara+SK >>alpaca+5P
◧
2. JChara+SK[view] [source] 2022-10-17 10:01:37
>>crummy+(OP)
The only algorithm I'll accept from copilot is a rot13 function, it got the rot26 one wrong.
◧
3. alpaca+5P[view] [source] 2022-10-17 10:44:21
>>crummy+(OP)
And the easy, boring, legally unproblematic stuff can already be handled by good IDE completion features. As a bonus those are actually tested and deterministic.
replies(1): >>crummy+na2
◧◩
4. crummy+na2[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-10-17 17:32:36
>>alpaca+5P
I use an IDE with plenty of smart completion. Copilot offers considerably more (otherwise I wouldn't use or pay for it).
[go to top]