zlacker

Mozilla isn't even using the donations they collect themselve for browser development.

>>accoun+(OP)
its a fucked up situation but do you have any alternatives? wikipedia keeping amasing all that money while mozilla sinks deeper and deeper into being dependent on google ad money, reducing costs which means laying off developers?

>>2Gkash+x1
Of course there is an alternative... not donating to either of those corrupt businesses.

>>ifqwz+l3
should probably donate to google instead then

>>2Gkash+g8
False dichotomy.

>>2Gkash+x1
Mozilla was a highly effective organization when Mozilla Corporation had in the range of 150–200 people (or even less) on payroll. The increase in (paid) headcount has been mainly correlated with:

- the removal of features in the name of smaller surface area (while at the same time adding telemetry and analytics[1])

- other lame fixtures of soulless corporations like cringy/dishonest PR babble

There's also stuff like breaking incoming links to content on mozilla.org; making it steadily harder to contribute; keeping things closed source (whereas before everything was licensed under MPL or some other FOSS license); being willing to cut deals with partners that come with strings attached and NDAs; wasting probably a billion dollars on obviously doomed things like Firefox OS and calling it a "moonshot"; etc.

1. <https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30178875>