zlacker

The discussion is about what (if anything) the linux kernel should do to help satisfy the guarantees that rust wants to make.

Accepting the idea that rust guarantees aren't necessarily always good is needed to accept the idea that those guarantees might need to be relaxed, or at least don't necessarily justify linux kernel changes.

>>jmull+(OP)
>Accepting the idea that rust guarantees aren't necessarily always good

The idea that rust guarantees aren't necessarily always good is completely orthogonal to a condescending diatribe about how "there are no absolute guarantees", and totally needlessly connected to "go back to kindergarten" and "stop believing in Santa" BS.