zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. zetapo+(OP)[view] [source] 2022-10-02 15:00:42
Yeah ... Just reboot the machine and make me loose all my work, bro.
replies(1): >>charci+h8
2. charci+h8[view] [source] 2022-10-02 15:46:40
>>zetapo+(OP)
This is why programs automatically saving their state is important.
replies(2): >>elteto+Ed >>jmull+cg
◧◩
3. elteto+Ed[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-10-02 16:16:13
>>charci+h8
No, this is why kernels prioritizing not crashing is important. Applications saving their work is a nice extra.
◧◩
4. jmull+cg[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-10-02 16:29:20
>>charci+h8
That's not a solution to OS instability.

Reliably saving state in the face of sudden total failure is both very tricky and app-specific. Just saving state changes automatically won't do it -- partial writes of complex state are likely to be inconsistent without luck or careful design and QA controls (tests, testing, on-going controls to ensure nothing new operates or relies on anything outside the safe state-saving mechanism).

It makes a lot more sense to put the effort into making the OS continue as well as it can, vs requiring every app to harden itself against sudden total failures.

[go to top]