zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. PuppyT+(OP)[view] [source] 2022-09-22 20:49:05
Hey, thanks for correcting me. You're right that the issue was Limbaugh's radio program, not his TV. I apologize for getting my example wrong, but I think my overall point is still a valid one (that just because social media is more effective at spewing bad rhetoric doesn't mean bad rhetoric is ineffective in other media).
replies(1): >>dr_dsh+Td
2. dr_dsh+Td[view] [source] 2022-09-22 22:12:52
>>PuppyT+(OP)
Your point was valid but your example was creepily wrong.
replies(1): >>oyashi+QC
◧◩
3. oyashi+QC[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-09-23 01:21:13
>>dr_dsh+Td
People remember him for his TV program but get the effects from his radio program, not exactly a creepy mistake just association mistake which happens to anyone.
[go to top]