zlacker

[parent] [thread] 8 comments
1. wahnfr+(OP)[view] [source] 2022-09-22 15:20:00
Did you know you can look at profiles, not just the feed?
replies(3): >>tmpz22+11 >>matai_+49 >>maximu+xF2
2. tmpz22+11[view] [source] 2022-09-22 15:23:36
>>wahnfr+(OP)
So if we engage with facebook more, and invest more time, we can have slightly better content?
replies(2): >>wahnfr+46 >>pohl+WO
◧◩
3. wahnfr+46[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-09-22 15:40:57
>>tmpz22+11
No, the context of this thread is a study on mentally harmful content. I’m not here to coach people on seeking quality Facebook content
4. matai_+49[view] [source] 2022-09-22 15:51:21
>>wahnfr+(OP)
True, I do use Facebook profiles to remember the names of the children of my friends/family. But I can't remember the last "wall" I saw that had anything from this year on it.
replies(1): >>xapata+gi
◧◩
5. xapata+gi[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-09-22 16:30:47
>>matai_+49
You're saying that your friends and family don't post to Facebook? In this light, your first comment was misleading. You implied that Facebook's post-display algorithm was suppressing your friends and family.
replies(1): >>matai_+jp
◧◩◪
6. matai_+jp[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-09-22 17:02:58
>>xapata+gi
Not misleading, emblematic. Facebook's utilization has plummeted.
replies(1): >>xapata+n31
◧◩
7. pohl+WO[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-09-22 19:05:29
>>tmpz22+11
Maybe think of it in terms of active vs passive engagement, rather than more or less engagement. In other words: using the tool, rather than letting the tool use you.
◧◩◪◨
8. xapata+n31[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-09-22 20:24:06
>>matai_+jp
I thought you originally meant that your friends were frequent posters.
9. maximu+xF2[view] [source] 2022-09-23 11:22:15
>>wahnfr+(OP)
What is this? MySpace?
[go to top]