zlacker

[parent] [thread] 9 comments
1. fluori+(OP)[view] [source] 2022-09-14 19:49:54
You're answering a point no one made. It has nothing to do with "being envious".

Imagine you were asked to donate to "keep the animal shelter open", and went you went there you found that they were using gold water dishes for the little critters. You would be within your right to complain. You thought you were donating to keep it operating, but now you find that they're using funds on frivolous expenses. Is there something a dish made out of gold does that one made out of plastic doesn't, to justify the expense? Is there something a $350k executive does that a minimum wage one (or even none at all) doesn't?

Any organization that asks for donations would be subject to criticism if it doesn't optimize its operations as much as possible.

replies(1): >>bawolf+Cd
2. bawolf+Cd[view] [source] 2022-09-14 21:00:17
>>fluori+(OP)
> You're answering a point no one made. It has nothing to do with "being envious".

Then what is the relavence of saying "I guess you have to compare it to the salary of the donors who feel compelled ..."? The donors dont do work similar. The only reason i could possibly imagine bringing this up would be something to do with envy between the average person's salary vs the salary of a high skill position. If not that, what was this sentence trying to say?

> Is there something a $350k executive does that a minimum wage one

350k executives exist. Minimum wage one's don't.

Imagine you were donating to an animal shelter, but you discover that they spend more on dogfood than you do on feeding your family. You imagine the reason is that they are feeding the dogs caviar, but the real reason is it costs more to feed 150 dogs than it does to feed 4 people.

replies(1): >>fluori+Os
◧◩
3. fluori+Os[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-09-14 22:21:50
>>bawolf+Cd
The relevance is that some of those donors are donating the little money they have because they think there's a chance Wikipedia might cease to exist otherwise, not knowing that the WMF is actually using that money on gold water dishes rather than saving it for a rainy day.

Simply put, if Wikipedia asks for donations to continue operating, 100% of those donations should go towards server costs. That can include the hardware costs, the power, the bandwidth, and the people who maintain those servers. Using the money that was raised to keep it running for any other purpose is at least deceptive.

>Imagine you were donating to an animal shelter, but you discover that they spend more on dogfood than you do on feeding your family. You imagine the reason is that they are feeding the dogs caviar, but the real reason is it costs more to feed 150 dogs than it does to feed 4 people.

Now imagine that the shelter spends only 10% of its donations on dog food and other dog-related costs, and the rest goes to salaries for people who aren't caring for the dogs and to awareness campaigns. (I'm not implying this is the breakdown in Wikipedia's case; it's just an example.) Even if you think these are worthwhile uses for those funds, don't you think donors should know that their donations will be spent this way before they donate?

replies(1): >>bawolf+tL
◧◩◪
4. bawolf+tL[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-09-15 00:25:01
>>fluori+Os
But surely the managers of people who maintain those servers are part of the cost of maintaining those servers.

I know people like to complain that managers are useless, but if they really were, every company would get rid of them.

The cost of managers is what is being complained about in this thread. There might be other superflorus things wmf might spend money on which i might agree with you on, but this doesn't seem to be one of them.

replies(1): >>fluori+KQ
◧◩◪◨
5. fluori+KQ[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-09-15 01:06:50
>>bawolf+tL
If they're paying 350K for an ops manager, that's definitely too much.
replies(1): >>bawolf+5W
◧◩◪◨⬒
6. bawolf+5W[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-09-15 01:49:39
>>fluori+KQ
They are paying 350k for a ceo, who is a manager of a manager of an ops manager.

Which is way way below industry average.

replies(2): >>fluori+nY >>akolbe+XL1
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
7. fluori+nY[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-09-15 02:11:21
>>bawolf+5W
Then when you said

>But surely the managers of people who maintain those servers are part of the cost of maintaining those servers.

you were raising an irrelevant point, because the salaries of the direct managers of the operations team is not what's under discussion here. They wouldn't need such a deep organizational structure if they weren't paying a bunch of people that take no part in running the site.

replies(1): >>bawolf+bc1
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
8. bawolf+bc1[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-09-15 04:26:20
>>fluori+nY
What do you think an appropriate number of people is to run the sixth most popular website in the world?

Even if you cut everyone doing software development (which would in itself probably cause a collapse since that is critical to keeping wikipedia running), cut all the lawyers (also pretty important), cut the trust and safety people, etc - you are still left with quite a lot of sysadmins, more than can reasonably be handled by a single manager.

replies(1): >>fluori+ZB1
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯
9. fluori+ZB1[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-09-15 07:55:43
>>bawolf+bc1
Even if you had multiple operations teams, you could still get away with a fairly flat organizational structure. Not every organization needs to be a top-down hierarchy, and a flat organization makes sense if your funds come from donations and you don't want to pay for too many people who won't directly produce anything.

Now, if your primary objective is not to run a website but something else entirely, then it does make sense for your infrastructure and the salaries of the people maintaining it not to be the largest part of your budget.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
10. akolbe+XL1[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-09-15 09:24:49
>>bawolf+5W
By 2020, the latest figures we have (page 48 of the Form 990), there were 8 people whose total compensation exceeded $300K. The CEO was at $423k:

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/foundation/e/e4/Wikim...

This was two years ago. Some of these salaries rose by over 20 or 30 percent in the space of two years, when annual US inflation was at 2%. I fully expect to find even greater salary rises since – once the Form 990 for this year is published sometime in 2024 – as US inflation went up during the pandemic.

[go to top]