zlacker

"Until Linux, UNIX didn't even run on PCs at all, only expensive proprietary hardware"

Not true. There was Xenix, SCO, and Coherent as 3 examples off the top of my head.

>>nevera+(OP)
Yes! I ran Coherent 4.0 on a 386SX laptop when I was in high school (before moving to Linux.) Coherent had incredible documentation, something that is very rare today. I still remember that book with the shell on it, and learned a ton about systems administration and POSIX programming from it.

Here it is: https://archive.org/details/CoherentMan

>>nevera+(OP)
It did, but for their prices and hardware requirements I would rather use OS/2 instead.

>>nevera+(OP)
You're right, I'd forgotten about Xenix. Never heard of Coherent. SCO I thought was big iron but I'll take your word for it that I'm wrong about that. There sure were a lot of UNIX vendors back then!

>>pjmlp+cm
Coherent was relatively cheap if you wanted a PC unix clone. $100 in 1992: https://techmonitor.ai/technology/coherent_unixalike_for_int...

>>icedch+Ff1
That is the price for the software + the hardware to actually run it at an acceptable speed.

And all things being equal you could still get OS/2 as low as $49,

> The suggested introductory price of OS/2 2.0 is $139. However, the cost falls to $99 for users upgrading from DOS, which includes just about anyone, and to $49 for users who are willing to turn in their Microsoft version of Windows.

https://www.nytimes.com/1992/04/21/science/personal-computer...

>>pjmlp+3L2
True, OS/2 was much cheaper. Coherent was relatively cheap for a Unix clone, which is basically what I was getting at. SCO Xenix / Unix was in the $500+ range. A C compiler wasn't even included, if I recall.