zlacker

[parent] [thread] 0 comments
1. jollyb+(OP)[view] [source] 2022-09-08 22:39:46
It's a life of 'Duty' not a life of 'Arbitrary Wealth'.

It's not exactly poverty, but the 'classist' arguments, to the extent they are rooted in 'wealth distribution' are ridiculous and naive with respect to Constitutional Monarchies.

The 'Head of State' gets a nice home, oh well, it's a drop in the bucket.

That's fundamentally different than some fat oligarch.

BTW Charles will be a fine King. He's nerdy and awkward and everyone loved the beloved Dianna because she was pretty and breezy, which is fine, but I don't believe that 'Instagrammable' qualities are those that fill the role.

[go to top]