zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. wilson+(OP)[view] [source] 2022-09-08 22:02:20
> she chose duty

I would like to choose the duty of being fabulously wealthy and literally immune to criminal or civil prosecution, too.

replies(1): >>smegge+Fn
2. smegge+Fn[view] [source] 2022-09-09 01:12:31
>>wilson+(OP)
to be fair those are entirely theoretical powers, the second any of that become a legitimate issue parliament can remove them. Just ask King Charles I about how well sovereign immunity saves the monarch from criminal prosecution.
replies(1): >>Wastin+mZ2
◧◩
3. Wastin+mZ2[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-09-09 19:59:47
>>smegge+Fn
Completely theoretical. Actually no member of the British royal family has ever been in a situation where the common man would rote in jail for life and got away scot-free. It was all my imagination these past few years.
[go to top]