zlacker

[parent] [thread] 0 comments
1. ddevau+(OP)[view] [source] 2022-08-17 12:31:24
I don't entirely disagree. In fact I wrote a blog post making similar arguments:

https://drewdevault.com/2022/01/18/Pine64s-weird-priorities....

Ideally Pine64 would be facilitating the development of a software stack which is then shared among the distributions. But, that's not what they're doing -- they're all-in on relying 100% on "the community" to produce the software. So, given this constraint, are they doing it well?

The answer is "no". Choosing Manjaro alone is not going to get the software built. As explained in TFA, the previous solution encouraging diversity did more to get the software built and is largely attributable for the platform's initial success in building out basic software support. Manjaro does not have a monopoly on the software experts, in fact, they have none of the software experts. By throwing Pine64's entire lot in with Manjaro they are burning the people who actually work on solving these problems. That's not a productive way to build and maintain a community.

[go to top]