zlacker

I've yet to have any issues with them.

>>aaaaaa+(OP)
Relevant discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30504812

>>aaaaaa+(OP)
They're the registrar for MANY spammers and scammers, and provide hosting for plenty of them. They used to respond to abuse complaints; now they just drop complaints sent to their abuse address.

That doesn't make them any worse than, say, GoDaddy, but given enough time, they'll probably end up just as bad.

>>aaaaaa+(OP)
The problem with these kinds of comments is, most people who use godaddy probably haven't had issues with them either. If 10% of users have their domain terminated for bullshit reasons -- which would be a ridiculously unimaginably high fraction -- 90% of users would still say "I have yet to have any issues with them".

>>mort96+V5
In the early days GD was run by evangelicals and they had no compunction against canceling a domain for religious reasons. It amazes me that they managed to whitewash their image be among those who should know better.

>>kevin_+Fl
The absurd commercials they put out (with the "uncensored" version on their website) probably helped that.