zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. enjo+(OP)[view] [source] 2011-11-15 07:27:07
It had everything to do with fragmentation. Honeycomb (by Googles admission) was a stop-gap to get something out for tablets. They chose not to release the source as they wanted to limit the number of devices shipping with honeycomb in favor of a more compatible (and developer friendly) version in ICS.
replies(1): >>driveb+V2
◧
2. driveb+V2[view] [source] 2011-11-15 08:50:43
>>enjo+(OP)
How is that related to fragmentation?
replies(1): >>esrauc+II
◧◩
3. esrauc+II[view] [source] [discussion] 2011-11-15 20:55:18
>>driveb+V2
If you are writing an app for phones you don't have to target honeycomb at all, that is reduced fragmentation.
replies(1): >>driveb+iR
◧◩◪
4. driveb+iR[view] [source] [discussion] 2011-11-15 22:42:32
>>esrauc+II
Ah, I assumed enjo was saying it as a negative.
[go to top]