zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. candid+(OP)[view] [source] 2022-07-28 12:40:49
Is folding@home obsolete now?
replies(4): >>sevent+Q2 >>foxhop+X2 >>flobos+49 >>dekhn+dd
2. sevent+Q2[view] [source] 2022-07-28 12:58:39
>>candid+(OP)
Good question… I’d imagine that other methods of folding solutions are still valuable, because AlphaFold needs to be checked.
3. foxhop+X2[view] [source] 2022-07-28 12:59:10
>>candid+(OP)
I would say no, the two approaches may be used to validate each other.
4. flobos+49[view] [source] 2022-07-28 13:34:05
>>candid+(OP)
Folding@home answers a related but different question. While AlphaFold returns the picture of a folded protein in its most energetically stable conformation, Folding@home returns a video of the protein undergoing folding, traversing its energy landscape.
5. dekhn+dd[view] [source] 2022-07-28 13:55:28
>>candid+(OP)
It's not, but the question is (and has long been) whether the energy expended by folding@home is worth the scientific result. IMHO- probably not.
[go to top]