zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. luma+(OP)[view] [source] 2022-07-28 12:17:27
Same as any other prediction I'd presume. Run it against a known protein and see how the answer lines up. Predict the structure of an unknown protein, then use traditional methods (x-ray crystallography, maybe STEM, etc) to verify.
replies(3): >>christ+g1 >>gillea+b2 >>iandan+Z2
2. christ+g1[view] [source] 2022-07-28 12:25:32
>>luma+(OP)
This is exactly right.
3. gillea+b2[view] [source] 2022-07-28 12:32:40
>>luma+(OP)
As a simple example, one measure used to compare a predicted structure against a reference is the RMSD (root mean square deviation).

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Root-mean-square_deviation_o...

The lower the RMSD between two structures, the better (up to some limit).

4. iandan+Z2[view] [source] 2022-07-28 12:38:15
>>luma+(OP)
"Verify" is almost correct. The crystallography data is taken to be "ground truth" and the predicted protein structure from AlphaFold is taken to be a good guess starting point. Then other software can produce a model that is a best fit to the ground truth data starting from the good guess. So even if the guess is wrong in detail it's still useful to reduce the search space.
[go to top]