zlacker

Consider that the one whose comment is currently at the top is pro-cancel-Stallman, and he also works on "free" software related to secure boot --- not as in breaking, but instead aiding its adoption.

The FSF was strongly against secure boot, then inexplicably started seeming to be in favour of it.

Connect the dots yourself.

>>userbi+(OP)
Why don’t you spell out the conspiracy theory directly? It’s not relevant to this thread even if true but leaving the details vague makes it seem like you don’t think it would stand up.

>>acdha+21
You only think it's a "conspiracy theory" because that's what they have told you to believe. The organisations of OSS have been infected with those whose ultimate goal is to EEE, and they will do it by whatever means they have available to them.

>>userbi+Sa
No, I think it’s a conspiracy theory because it’s poorly argued and full of insinuation, following the classic pattern of expecting the reader to fill in the gaps. This is how it magically becomes a negative when someone works to make free software compatible with modern hardware in a way most users want.