zlacker

[parent] [thread] 8 comments
1. hgazx+(OP)[view] [source] 2022-07-26 07:19:35
Regardless, I think that the pc platform deserves a good anti cheat solution.

Separating the groups of those who have a good anti cheat system enabled (such as this) and those who don’t is a good compromise for everybody. I think more reasonable companies such as Valve will go that way.

replies(2): >>shmerl+B >>Sakos+29
2. shmerl+B[view] [source] 2022-07-26 07:26:49
>>hgazx+(OP)
Good anti-cheat solution is server side AI. Anything client side is malware.
replies(2): >>hgazx+k2 >>hammyh+q7
◧◩
3. hgazx+k2[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-07-26 07:46:25
>>shmerl+B
I know that this is a popular take here, which is why I proposed that there should be a mechanism to opt out. But that would mean that you would have to play against those who opted out as well.
replies(1): >>tpxl+Z9
◧◩
4. hammyh+q7[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-07-26 08:39:49
>>shmerl+B
Louder for the Cheeto-dust-covered people in the back.
5. Sakos+29[view] [source] 2022-07-26 08:58:43
>>hgazx+(OP)
Anything that prevents me from modding or cheating in my single player games is anathema to me. And companies like Activision, Ubisoft and Rockstar would love a hardware-based system that takes control away from gamers.
replies(2): >>hgazx+P9 >>whywhy+1h
◧◩
6. hgazx+P9[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-07-26 09:07:46
>>Sakos+29
I didn’t say anything about single player games.
replies(1): >>Sakos+zC
◧◩◪
7. tpxl+Z9[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-07-26 09:08:57
>>hgazx+k2
I would like to have an anti-cheat mechanism (that works), not a god damned security-nightmare rootkit that scans and uploads my private files to god knows where.
◧◩
8. whywhy+1h[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-07-26 10:15:31
>>Sakos+29
Who needs to cheat in a Ubisoft game? Just point to the marker, walk, then hit R1 a few times, rinse repeat for 30 hours.
◧◩◪
9. Sakos+zC[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-07-26 13:08:04
>>hgazx+P9
You didn't, but if the tech is there, it will be used.
[go to top]