zlacker

the unreliable source in question is not a person, but a site

does the site have a track record of reliable fact checking from their editorial team which reviews submitted content?

>>ImPost+(OP)
It's a substack blog that publishes opinion pieces. They're mostly aimed at subscribers who intentionally seek out content she curates or solicits. YOu know, a substack newsletter.

You can judge this article on its own merits, it's essentially a one off. It cites some sources, is written by subject matter experts, and is making claims about publicly available data. Do you really need a fact checker to gate keep here? I fail to see how the place of publication has any bearing here on the correctness or soundness of the arguments in the article.