zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. mulmen+(OP)[view] [source] 2022-07-11 01:17:46
The difference between planned and convenient seems to be intent. And in this context that difference very much matters. I wouldn’t conflate the two.
replies(1): >>winter+02
2. winter+02[view] [source] 2022-07-11 01:38:57
>>mulmen+(OP)
Depends on who exactly we are talking about as having the intent...

Both planned and convenient obsolescence are beneficial to device manufacturers. Without proper accountability for that, it only becomes a normal practice.

replies(1): >>mulmen+b2
◧◩
3. mulmen+b2[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-07-11 01:41:15
>>winter+02
> Depends on who exactly we are talking about as having the intent...

The manufacturer, obviously. Who else would it be?

Could be an innocent mistake or a deliberate decision. Further action should be predicated on the root cause. Which includes intent.

[go to top]