zlacker

[parent] [thread] 6 comments
1. mumphs+(OP)[view] [source] 2022-07-09 17:44:51
Used extensively by Mullvad VPN for a lot of their infrastructure

https://mullvad.net/en/blog/2022/6/15/mullvad-is-now-continu...

replies(2): >>cpach+A7 >>Infern+j41
◧
2. cpach+A7[view] [source] 2022-07-09 18:35:02
>>mumphs+(OP)
Not really for infrastructure though? Still neat.
replies(2): >>smolde+kN >>octobe+cf1
◧◩
3. smolde+kN[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-07-10 00:11:27
>>cpach+A7
I'd bet you dollars to donuts that they're using it to host Whonix nodes for their infrastructure.
replies(1): >>dfc+bZ
◧◩◪
4. dfc+bZ[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-07-10 02:31:33
>>smolde+kN
Whonix nodes for what?
replies(1): >>pyinst+Jr1
◧
5. Infern+j41[view] [source] 2022-07-10 03:40:33
>>mumphs+(OP)
Knowing what I know of Qubes, and reading that post - I think they mean lots of folks are using it for their workstations. Qubes doesn't really make sense on a server, which is how I'd normally read "infrastructure".
◧◩
6. octobe+cf1[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-07-10 06:21:31
>>cpach+A7
So their sysadmins don't get hacked.

VPN providers are an annoyance for "collect it all" types. If they have the ingress servers' wireguard private keys, that annoyance goes away. Note that I use the term "annoyance", not "threat"... they sit in that gray zone where it's an irritant but not worth kidnapping people.

◧◩◪◨
7. pyinst+Jr1[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-07-10 09:17:50
>>dfc+bZ
Ephemeral server instances?
[go to top]