zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. dang+(OP)[view] [source] 2022-07-09 03:39:38
We've only had 5 minutes to talk about it so far, but unless something changes, I don't see why we wouldn't go back to M5.
replies(1): >>booi+Kk
2. booi+Kk[view] [source] 2022-07-09 07:13:48
>>dang+(OP)
Well having a double server failure would definitely make me think about going back to the same solution..
replies(1): >>hdjjhh+ew
◧◩
3. hdjjhh+ew[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-07-09 09:29:22
>>booi+Kk
I'd say the opposite: having experienced this, they would make sure to significantly reduce the probability of it happening again.

In the past, I had a similar problem because of using hardware from the same batch. In retrospect, it's silly to be surprised they died at the same time.

[go to top]