zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. furyof+(OP)[view] [source] 2022-07-09 02:15:46
That argument really got to you, did it?
replies(1): >>undowa+q2
2. undowa+q2[view] [source] 2022-07-09 02:31:30
>>furyof+(OP)
My first thought as well -- but it was phrased as, "of course there is some specific person here who, due to a long-running disagreement over facts, has been passively gathering relevant data over a period of years."

It's sort of like Rule 34, but for HN. "There is data of it"

replies(1): >>furyof+P8
◧◩
3. furyof+P8[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-07-09 03:21:53
>>undowa+q2
I'm certainly pleased by the result
[go to top]