zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. within+(OP)[view] [source] 2022-06-22 15:42:47
That doesn't change their incentives. They might make a nice browser, for you. On every other OS, Apple's software is so slow as to be borderline useless. Watching iTunes struggle to download album art is almost as entertaining as listening to the music.

I do use a MBP daily, and the software there is amazing. But seeing that their software barely works outside of their platform, it's a miracle they have any customers at all.

replies(1): >>corrra+k7
2. corrra+k7[view] [source] 2022-06-22 16:16:14
>>within+(OP)
> But seeing that their software barely works outside of their platform, it's a miracle they have any customers at all.

I don't think very many of their customers run any of their software anywhere other than on Macs and iDevices, so I expect that doesn't have much effect. Aside from the apple TV app on Roku and various TV operating systems and such. And still, none of this makes Safari not an "actual browser".

replies(1): >>within+ct
◧◩
3. within+ct[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-06-22 17:46:54
>>corrra+k7
I think by their decision not to implement so many APIs we can say it is /not/ an “actual browser” and more of “check the box” browser.
replies(1): >>wdb+Dx
◧◩◪
4. wdb+Dx[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-06-22 18:05:05
>>within+ct
Maybe. I think implementing APIs like WebUSB, WebHID API, Web Serial API, Web Bluetooth, Web MIDI API etc. is not a big issue. Missing Filesystem Access API and Push API, WebGPU API would be nice to have. But the latter two would need to implement in a way to protect privacy of the user.
[go to top]