zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. jacobo+(OP)[view] [source] 2022-06-22 14:01:35
There’s nothing “magical”, but Safari uses a lot less battery than Chrome.

Safari developers optimize for battery life whereas Chrome developers seem not to care about client-side resource use.

replies(1): >>native+tP
2. native+tP[view] [source] 2022-06-22 17:44:02
>>jacobo+(OP)
Right, yet, Chrome has an enormous number of Mac users. Apple argue that battery life is a topic so important it's worth banning competitors for but clearly when given the choice users disagree. There are other things more important to them.
replies(1): >>jacobo+Bp1
◧◩
3. jacobo+Bp1[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-06-22 20:34:14
>>native+tP
My impression is that most computer users have a limited sense of which software applications are churning through battery, and instead just blame the computer vendor.

That is, if Chrome churns through battery on a Mac laptop, the typical user is going to just think “Apple laptops have poor battery life”, never realizing that switching to Safari would make a significant difference.

[go to top]