zlacker

Idk, as a company I would still want to run my interview, and candidates would probably hate the double interview. Pre interview would also get stale fast.

Companies wouldn't trust a third party to run binding technical assessment for them, and quality devs would probably avoid places that hire without having someone from the destination team show up

I think the opposite would be more beneficial: a light check to validate work claims and some high level foundational question about code just to make sure one has basic proficiency in what he claims he has

Then companies would need lot less hr pre-screening and could focus in technology and culture matching

>>averev+(OP)
I'm very sure that a consortium of FANG type companies could get together and design a shared interview for generic technical skills, and then run normal interviews for candidates that pass that step. And when I say normal interviews, I mean the stuff that an individual company should want to do, such as behavioral, talking about past projects, etc. Making candidates do leetcode type sessions at every place they apply is a waste of time for both candidates and companies.

>>averev+(OP)
I don't think the proposition (for employers) is really to be able to skip interviews altogether, but to find "diamonds in the rough", candidates who may have an exceptional grasp of material that might not be suggested by their resume or years of experience or whatever.

If you can hire someone skilled, but who other companies might overlook, that's a huge benefit to your team.

Triplebyte is really just the first screen, and the importance each company wants to put on the signal is up to them.