zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. SirHou+(OP)[view] [source] 2022-05-24 07:26:49
Most images you see from these services will not have a watermark on them. Cropping is trivial.
replies(2): >>ithkui+48 >>wnkrsh+cm
2. ithkui+48[view] [source] 2022-05-24 08:46:13
>>SirHou+(OP)
Perhaps a watermark should be embedded in a subtle way across the whole image. What is the word? "Steganography" is designed to solve a different problem and I don't think it survives recompression etc. Is there a way to create weakly secure watermarks that are invisible to naked eye, spread across the whole image, resistant to scaling and lossless compression (to a point)?
replies(1): >>wongar+ib
◧◩
3. wongar+ib[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-05-24 09:19:21
>>ithkui+48
Invisible, robust watermarks had a lot of attention in research from the late 90s to the early 10s, and apparently some resurgence with the availability of cheap GPU power.

Naturally there's a python library [1] with some algorithms that are resistant to lossy compression, cropping, brightness changes, etc. Scaling seems to be a weakness though.

1: https://pypi.org/project/invisible-watermark/

4. wnkrsh+cm[view] [source] 2022-05-24 11:01:53
>>SirHou+(OP)
It's ironic, seeing people who build models trained on other people's work (which is in no way credited) to be worried about origin and credit.
[go to top]