zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. whywhy+(OP)[view] [source] 2022-05-24 01:10:33
The AI ethics thing is just a PR larp at this point.

“Oh our tech is so dangerous and amazing it could turn the world upside down” yet we hand it to random Bluechecks on Twitter.

It’s just marketing

replies(2): >>fragme+V4 >>smaude+o8
2. fragme+V4[view] [source] 2022-05-24 01:53:13
>>whywhy+(OP)
You know Twitter and Google are different companies, right?
replies(1): >>gamego+T5
◧◩
3. gamego+T5[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-05-24 02:02:57
>>fragme+V4
The commenter was probably referring to the fact that the people who tend to get access to things like GPT3 or DALL-E 2 tend to be people with large Twitter followings (and blue checks), and that there may be a significant marketing component to this fact.
4. smaude+o8[view] [source] 2022-05-24 02:32:35
>>whywhy+(OP)
And that's why we need to be shutting this stuff down, completely.

Someone tried to say there were ethics committees etc the other day...what a bad joke. Who checks the ethics committee is making ethical decisions?

I was told I "didn't know what" I was talking about, excuse from some over-important know-it-all who didn't know what ethics was, i.e. they don't know what they are talking about.

[go to top]