zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. addand+(OP)[view] [source] 2022-05-23 22:19:19
I agree. How cool would it be to get an 8 min version of your favorite song? Or an instant DnB remix? Or 10 more songs in the style of your favorite album?
replies(2): >>jonahb+a3 >>exac+Nz
2. jonahb+a3[view] [source] 2022-05-23 22:40:06
>>addand+(OP)
Yeah. I particularly love covers and often can hear in my head X playing Y's song. Would love tools to experiment with that for real.

In practice, my guess is that even though Dall-e level performance in music generation would be stunning and incredible, it would also be tiresome and predictable to consume on any extended basis. I mean- that's my reaction to Dall-e- I find the images astonishing and magical but can only look at them for limited periods of time. At these early stages in this new world the outputs of real individual brains are still more interesting.

But having tools like this to facilitate creation and inspiration by those brains- would be so so cool.

3. exac+Nz[view] [source] 2022-05-24 03:48:24
>>addand+(OP)
You can sort of do that with https://fairuseify.ml
replies(2): >>aemble+J91 >>jrh206+5i1
◧◩
4. aemble+J91[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-05-24 09:50:10
>>exac+Nz
I tried that site and the music sounds the same. I wonder if you can use this to bypass YouTube content ID check.
◧◩
5. jrh206+5i1[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-05-24 11:09:54
>>exac+Nz
I believe that this tech is possible, but this site doesn't provide it. Look at the source of the page: it's just a bunch of sleeps and then you 'download' the same file you provided.
replies(1): >>waqf+Lo1
◧◩◪
6. waqf+Lo1[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-05-24 12:05:22
>>jrh206+5i1
The tech may be possible, but it won't solve anyone's copyright problems. The result would be a "derived work" of the original, irrespective of whether it sounded similar or not.
[go to top]