zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. JumpCr+(OP)[view] [source] 2022-05-22 07:43:22
> OP's claim was that quantitative finance was hard science*

These are colloquial terms [1]. We might as well argue about whether Pop Tarts are ravioli or tacos sandwiches.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hard_and_soft_science

replies(2): >>c0balt+s2 >>arinle+46
2. c0balt+s2[view] [source] 2022-05-22 08:20:31
>>JumpCr+(OP)
What is(n't) a taco is a semi-solved problem[0].

[0]: https://cuberule.com/

3. arinle+46[view] [source] 2022-05-22 09:07:09
>>JumpCr+(OP)
> These are colloquial terms [1].

Colloquial terms whose concrete meaning does not correspond to OP's claim.

There is no ambiguity in this: if your models are not testable and fail to predict behavior then it's not hard science.

[go to top]