zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. npc123+(OP)[view] [source] 2022-05-21 21:47:07
(I upvoted you btw, I don't like to censor).

I'm a maximalist and even I am not that disingenous.

replies(1): >>xvecto+rJ
2. xvecto+rJ[view] [source] 2022-05-22 05:03:40
>>npc123+(OP)
I simply do not believe it was fraud, and I don't see any evidence provided of it being the case.

A badly-designed stablecoin? Incompetence? Sure. But the accusation of fraud requires evidence of malice.

replies(1): >>npc123+1d9
◧◩
3. npc123+1d9[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-05-24 21:16:21
>>xvecto+rJ
I see your point now.
[go to top]