zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. devout+(OP)[view] [source] 2022-05-19 10:07:04
This wasn’t a Ponzi scheme.

A Ponzi scheme is an investment fraud that pays existing investors with funds collected from new investors.

https://www.investor.gov/introduction-investing/investing-ba...

replies(2): >>charci+41 >>Khoth+G1
2. charci+41[view] [source] 2022-05-19 10:19:51
>>devout+(OP)
If anything it was closer to a pump and dump with Luna.

I don't get why calling it a Ponzi is so popular when there wasn't something paying returns using other people's money.

replies(1): >>devout+n2
3. Khoth+G1[view] [source] 2022-05-19 10:27:58
>>devout+(OP)
It's obfuscated by splitting the components into multiple cryptocurrencies with multiple actors, but that's what's going on. People were staking UST for 19.5% returns, and if you cut through the fluff, those returns came from later people putting their money in hoping to get those returns themselves. (and because UST was a stablecoin those returns were (ostensibly) in dollars, not just inflation of the coin value)
replies(1): >>devout+g2
◧◩
4. devout+g2[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-05-19 10:32:27
>>Khoth+G1
You just described banks. Banks take deposits & lend the money out at a higher rate. This is what anchor protocol was all about. Pay high interest, and lend at even higher interest.
replies(1): >>djbebs+jK
◧◩
5. devout+n2[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-05-19 10:33:31
>>charci+41
People like throwing the word scam around a lot, too. I don't think this was a scam. It was simply a shit financial product based on deluded fundamentals.
◧◩◪
6. djbebs+jK[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-05-19 14:58:01
>>devout+g2
Except anchor was lending at lower rates.
[go to top]