zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. irjust+(OP)[view] [source] 2022-05-19 07:03:53
That's a good question. Are you liable for fraud in this case? What about another case?

Say you promise 0.75% because the bank promised you 1% and you skim 0.25%. Is that scenario fraud? Probably not. At what point is it actually fraud?

My guess is it's not the yield but the loss of deposits.

replies(2): >>Ekaros+e >>nowher+x
2. Ekaros+e[view] [source] 2022-05-19 07:05:44
>>irjust+(OP)
At the point you don't have capability to pay the 0.75% yourself.
3. nowher+x[view] [source] 2022-05-19 07:08:20
>>irjust+(OP)
You are moving the goal post here. 15% is not 0.75%. The probability of returning 15% consistently is significantly lower than 0.75%.

If you guaranteed 0.75% to your customers and do not deliver, then you are liable. What you are describing is arbitrage and not what this scenario is about.

[go to top]