zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. ece+(OP)[view] [source] 2022-05-17 17:49:31
I think this is the main reason, and why only Apple can afford to make a small slab phone. They can still make some margin with 5% of a massive number, while others can't make any.

Foldables seem like a better compromise here, and hopefully more like the zflip/razr get in this $700-800 range with stock android, good cameras, and decent battery life. The zflip 3 has been sold for $800, just give me stock android and I'd be a buyer. I'd be ok with a slightly slower processor if it means a better battery life, but within 10-20% of a flagship. Between a $450 6.1 inch Pixel 6a, or a $700-800 folding phone, it's going to be kind of tough to compete with a smaller slab phone if it's going to have to make more compromises to stay small.

I'd love a Nexus 4 sized phone again, but these aren't bad options, if you want small, go folding, or get a 6a. I'm sure the mini is a good option if you're ok with iOS.

replies(1): >>dont__+76
2. dont__+76[view] [source] 2022-05-17 18:18:56
>>ece+(OP)
Foldables are a crappy solution. I do not want a tablet. I have no desire to watch videos on my phone, and I don't need a huge screen for any of the things I do on my phone regularly -- text, listen to music, occasionally browse HN and reddit, take photos. I understand that they fold up to essentially become weird-aspect ratio very thick phones... but that's not desirable for me either, especially at the foldable price point of ~$1000+.
replies(2): >>ece+NC >>fomine+GZ
◧◩
3. ece+NC[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-05-17 21:30:19
>>dont__+76
The zflip/razr foldables have smaller screens, and the zflip can be had for sub-$1000.
◧◩
4. fomine+GZ[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-05-18 00:40:21
>>dont__+76
nit: Foldables aren't for video, aspect ratio is far from 16:9. Effective video size is not much bigger than non foldable. It's great for reading web/book/pdf.
[go to top]