zlacker

[parent] [thread] 7 comments
1. nfoz+(OP)[view] [source] 2022-05-17 17:34:22
"selfie"? Video-calls are especially normalized now, since the pandemic. My family and friends use video-calls more often than voice-only calls now.
replies(2): >>brnaft+y8 >>maskli+ka
2. brnaft+y8[view] [source] 2022-05-17 18:14:00
>>nfoz+(OP)
You do that on the phone? I'd never.

And nobody I know has changed their communication. Discord, text, call. Everyone in my milieu is painfully average.

replies(2): >>jan_g+4k >>dorfsm+Br
3. maskli+ka[view] [source] 2022-05-17 18:23:34
>>nfoz+(OP)
Front cameras are also useful for other stuff e.g. taking angled pictures with little visibility is much easier with the front facing camera because you can see what you're aiming at.

It can even take pictures in the dark because the display will be used as a floodlight, though in that case aiming doesn't really work unless the software brightening is sufficient to at least gain an idea.

Front camera also works as a mirror in a pinch, much easier than trying to aim the back camera then flipping the phone around and finding out how off you were.

Do people taking selfies even use the front camera? I feel like image quality is really rather poor for that use case but it's not my jam.

◧◩
4. jan_g+4k[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-05-17 19:15:45
>>brnaft+y8
Nobody? I'm sort of in the same boat (I quite dislike video calls), but my extended family (from young to 60+) have started during pandemic and now continue to video call each other quite regularly - including group video calls.

As I said, not my preference and I rarely join, but for example my wife does video calls almost on a daily basis. So the "selfie" camera seems to be increasingly an important feature for the regular user.

replies(1): >>brnaft+Yp
◧◩◪
5. brnaft+Yp[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-05-17 19:48:49
>>jan_g+4k
I've seen it used once and to a disastrous result. I kinda feel like there are other workarounds too:

I remember one of the Motorola phones was designed for expansions, but that was pre-USB C. If you had a horizontally symmetrical phone, maybe widgets could solve the problem? Front facing and rear facing, while also being privacy respecting, no notch necessary, and similar resolution to boot. so maybe easier to source. Free up some room on the SOC and relieve some complexity while providing the added benefit of port protection. Presumably this could be applied to SD and obviously 3.5mm jacks.

replies(1): >>SamBam+gf1
◧◩
6. dorfsm+Br[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-05-17 19:59:50
>>brnaft+y8
A lot of people on my circles have moved to Signal, and we do short video calls.
◧◩◪◨
7. SamBam+gf1[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-05-18 02:41:55
>>brnaft+Yp
> I've seen it used once

Ok, let's just accept now that you live in an isolated bubble, if your experience with video calls is "I've seen it used once and to a disastrous result."

I'm not denying your experience, but it's not the experience of the vast majority of the modern world now, across all categories of people. Many people may not use video calls regularly, but most people have had more experience than "seen it used once."

replies(1): >>Izkata+c92
◧◩◪◨⬒
8. Izkata+c92[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-05-18 12:57:00
>>SamBam+gf1
I don't think they do. Meets and Zooms seem to be the way people have gone, I hadn't even heard of phone video calls becoming more common before this thread, and my family definitely hasn't done it.
[go to top]