zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. choko+(OP)[view] [source] 2022-02-10 14:14:30
The scarcity might be artificially created, but that doesn't make it any less real.
replies(1): >>ajsnig+J
2. ajsnig+J[view] [source] 2022-02-10 14:17:52
>>choko+(OP)
I mean, it depends. If you live in Tokyo, the scarcity is real-real. If you live in a city, where just a re-zoning solves a lot of problems, the issue is atleast mostly solvable, even if it means shaking down a whole pyramid of government officials, and in some places, the housing crisis is bad enough, that they're aproaching the critical mass of people to make this happen.
replies(1): >>fusion+2w
◧◩
3. fusion+2w[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-02-10 16:09:51
>>ajsnig+J
You're playing semantics. If there aren't physically enough homes in NYC for the number of interested buyers there is Scarcity. Talking about that source of that scarcity is irrelevant. Re-Zoning fixes nothing in the short term and scarcity will remain. Even if you re-zoned you need to physically build up inventory which takes years.
replies(1): >>ajsnig+VM
◧◩◪
4. ajsnig+VM[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-02-10 17:11:14
>>fusion+2w
Yes, and new york (and san francisco, and many other places) are in a housing crisis for years now, and have not started any major building projects nor liberalized building larg(er) apartment buildings (in case of san francisco).

The best time to start building was 10, 15, 20 years ago, the next best time is now.

[go to top]