zlacker

> You have to keep in mind that a lot of those highlighted "trivial" series of mistakes can be just the result of parallel construction, and what evidence really "did them in" can be completely different from what's stated by the prosecution.

If you had such capabilities, the moment it is known you have it would immediately neutralize any value you derive from that capability.

What is the logical course of action?

Deny. Deny. Deny.

Disavowing, deception, secrecy of such capability is what gives them the edge.

Again, there is no proof that Satoshi Nakamoto was some good hearted criminal/spook.