zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. sydthr+(OP)[view] [source] 2022-02-08 18:10:05
Then it seems pure luck that some conniving sociopath at the top can lead a company to produce useful goods.
replies(1): >>hattma+r1
2. hattma+r1[view] [source] 2022-02-08 18:15:57
>>sydthr+(OP)
That's extremely subjective to your definition of useful. Investing in the best con artist isn't exactly a bad deal so long as you aren't the last mark.
replies(1): >>cestit+KT2
◧◩
3. cestit+KT2[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-02-09 14:49:06
>>hattma+r1
Depends on the nature of the con. Not everything's Ponzi. Some scams are advance fee, snake oil, getting the mark's payment details, identity theft, or something else that makes a loss for every mark.
[go to top]