> You just picked a single item and acted as though it were the only consideration in the universe. Did he anywhere say that this interesting phenomenon he observed was the worst thing in the world and made MS intolerable? Did he anywhere say that this was a uniquely MS problem?
This also seems like a great example.
He didn't make a nuanced reaction that recognizes two different truths, he stated one thing and then stated the opposite.
"I'm a generous person but I just want everything for myself." is not an example of nuance. It's an example of one or the other statement simply being untrue.
>> I get the point he's making. But still, if he didn't like the lack of nuance why not find somewhere to work other than Microsoft?
Can you quote the specific portions of text that explicitly communicates these specific ideas:
- {something} is the only consideration in the universe
- {something} is the worst thing in the world
- Microsoft is intolerable
- that these problems are a uniquely MS problem
- Microsoft sucks