zlacker

[parent] [thread] 1 comments
1. im3w1l+(OP)[view] [source] 2022-01-09 06:01:17
It is not a non-issue. Because 95% of people will not disable it. This means that if Microsoft asks some company to make changes to their program, then they will have a lot of leverage behind that ask. Even if you personally disable the gatekeeping, you will be affected indirectly as the market for non-compliant programs will be unsustainable. Everything you run will be microsoft compliant, outside maybe one or two hyper-niche things.

This is what Android has taught us.

replies(1): >>Godel_+o8
2. Godel_+o8[view] [source] 2022-01-09 07:45:22
>>im3w1l+(OP)
Except there are a ton of people (as in millions of them) who have smartscreen disabled because they're using a non-microsoft antivirus program. So no, this is a non-issue.

Also, smartscreen is not a naive block of unsigned code. Code blocking is reputation based, and people disabling smartscreen and running a binary contributes to that reputation. Which means that people like gp are actively helping by continuing to use Windows and running safe-but-unsigned apps. So, to reiterate, not an issue.

[go to top]