zlacker

[parent] [thread] 7 comments
1. heavys+(OP)[view] [source] 2022-01-06 01:57:32
> The email included a reply option labeled "don't contact me again," which I chose and then replied. But a few months later I got the same invitation.

All that clicking that link told Facebook is that you're a real person who reads their emails. It's like when you pick up the phone for a telemarketer, now they know they can continue bothering you because you're a real person and you answer your phone.

replies(4): >>alexth+B1 >>1vuio0+pq >>rendaw+Yt >>yourap+GT
2. alexth+B1[view] [source] 2022-01-06 02:09:47
>>heavys+(OP)
Wonder if that’s a fake account creation edge using that, if that signal is interpreted that clearly. Setup a bunch of fake emails, upload your “contacts” to some compromised accounts, have them click on links in the emails to enroll in FB.
3. 1vuio0+pq[view] [source] 2022-01-06 05:23:39
>>heavys+(OP)
"Email verification."

Tech companies prey on people's sense of good faith.

replies(1): >>idatum+K13
4. rendaw+Yt[view] [source] 2022-01-06 05:59:28
>>heavys+(OP)
That's a technique for avoiding criminals outside the reach of US law...
5. yourap+GT[view] [source] 2022-01-06 10:05:11
>>heavys+(OP)
> It's like when you pick up the phone for a telemarketer, now they know they can continue bothering you because you're a real person and you answer your phone.

The few times a telemarketer reaches through to me on one of my phones, I've put them off by asking in a niche foreign language in that nation whether they speak that language. Most of the time, they immediately hang up and I never hear from them again. Sometimes, they repeat their script, then hang up. I've never had someone respond in that language (that would be a blast to address).

replies(1): >>southe+2i1
◧◩
6. southe+2i1[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-01-06 13:11:56
>>yourap+GT
Another strategy that works well-enough is to ask for their company's legal information and a statement on how they obtained your personal information. I have yet to find a telemarketer who wouldn't hang up on me pulling that trick.
◧◩
7. idatum+K13[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-01-06 20:41:46
>>1vuio0+pq
Or worse, phone # for "security".
replies(1): >>1vuio0+LY3
◧◩◪
8. 1vuio0+LY3[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-01-07 01:25:35
>>idatum+K13
It will not stop there.

Expect to be asked to provide more "factors" in the future.

[go to top]