zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. boffin+(OP)[view] [source] 2021-12-30 09:58:10
Exactly. This curmudgeonly proposal that ones vocabulary remain immutable is for the dags and curs whose life has not been rewarded by the virtues of newly discovered language.
replies(2): >>roboca+Jx1 >>asxd+Yi8
2. roboca+Jx1[view] [source] 2021-12-30 20:44:43
>>boffin+(OP)
Making up words is fun for the writer, but it often not fun for the reader. Like the popular perception of poetry. Few people have a deep knowledge of their own language or other languages, so their inventions come across as childish.

Your own usage of “dags” is frustrating because as a reader from Australasia, “dag” has a common meaning. Example usages: “You’re a dag”, “Fred Dagg”, “rattle your dags”, “clean up those daggy sheep”. And back on topic, the common meaning in Australasia is not mentioned in the online American Merriam-Webster dictionary!

3. asxd+Yi8[view] [source] 2022-01-02 09:31:34
>>boffin+(OP)
I guess I should have emphasized that the operative phrase was

> getting a feel for how it's naturally being used.

[go to top]