zlacker
[parent]
[thread]
4 comments
1. jbvers+(OP)
[view]
[source]
2021-12-18 02:18:34
Come on man… you can run the whole thing off if a few Gb instance. Such a huge instance should be able to do about 100k a second!
replies(4):
>>anifor+x8
>>stilli+Xf
>>akvadr+zx
>>michae+C52
◧
2. anifor+x8
[view]
[source]
2021-12-18 03:47:46
>>jbvers+(OP)
Potential and actual usage aren't related. They might be having a lot of records and read/writes but maybe the actual pub/sub isn't that intensive. They seem to be using the same DB for everything
◧
3. stilli+Xf
[view]
[source]
2021-12-18 05:13:51
>>jbvers+(OP)
Be careful not to confuse average load with peak instantaneous load. Bursty workloads are the bane of capacity planners everywhere.
◧
4. akvadr+zx
[view]
[source]
2021-12-18 08:52:49
>>jbvers+(OP)
Does postgres scale that well? I would be interested in case studies as I've not seen much achieving beyond 10k records per second.
◧
5. michae+C52
[view]
[source]
2021-12-18 21:54:53
>>jbvers+(OP)
Whose to say it can't?
[go to top]