zlacker
[parent]
[thread]
3 comments
1. lambda+(OP)
[view]
[source]
2021-10-27 21:12:41
This. Code should be optimized for reading, I think this kind of code is OK for exploratory stuff, but needs to be rewritten later.
replies(1):
>>snicke+88
◧
2. snicke+88
[view]
[source]
2021-10-27 22:08:24
>>lambda+(OP)
Well. Code should be optimized first for correctness, and simple string concatenation will not work for URL params.
replies(1):
>>odonne+De
◧◩
3. odonne+De
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2021-10-27 23:03:42
>>snicke+88
It'll certainly work, just seems sloppy.
replies(1):
>>bennyg+vk
◧◩◪
4. bennyg+vk
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2021-10-27 23:38:01
>>odonne+De
Plenty of edge cases there (e.g. url encoding), but I don't want to preach to the choir and rabbit hole on this minor detail.
[go to top]