zlacker

[parent] [thread] 6 comments
1. netcyr+(OP)[view] [source] 2021-10-27 19:10:33
Why are people not bothered by privacy concerns in this case?
replies(5): >>bogwog+cd >>lvass+od >>jmnico+rg >>Gigach+ud1 >>pintxo+JJ1
2. bogwog+cd[view] [source] 2021-10-27 20:11:58
>>netcyr+(OP)
Because the generation that grew up without any privacy is growing up and getting jobs in tech.
3. lvass+od[view] [source] 2021-10-27 20:13:04
>>netcyr+(OP)
They're good kids who won't have to worry about their social credit.
4. jmnico+rg[view] [source] 2021-10-27 20:30:57
>>netcyr+(OP)
I suppose this thing upload your code to Microsoft servers then run some deep learning algos on it and get back to you with suggestions? It also probably keep your code to feed it to the algos.

If big tech was trustworthy I would use this with glee. But when I see how the world is turning, I'll continue to type boilerplate by hand (as long I'm allowed).

replies(1): >>gremli+mL4
5. Gigach+ud1[view] [source] 2021-10-28 04:25:26
>>netcyr+(OP)
Because the entire codebase I work on is already in the hands of github. I couldn't care if they can also see it being written live.
6. pintxo+JJ1[view] [source] 2021-10-28 10:33:00
>>netcyr+(OP)
I would be even more concerned about licensing and copyright at this point. We might see some interesting legal discussions around this, given you probably (I did not check the terms) give consent to Github using your code for other purposes beyond querying their model.
◧◩
7. gremli+mL4[view] [source] [discussion] 2021-10-29 07:03:50
>>jmnico+rg
> I suppose this thing upload your code to Microsoft servers then run some deep learning algos on it and get back to you with suggestions? It also probably keep your code to feed it to the algos.

Be sure you don't commit your code to github...as that's literally uploading your code to Microsoft servers, I mean if you just don't trust them for being 'Microsoft'.

[go to top]