zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. Angost+(OP)[view] [source] 2021-10-12 23:11:15
> What they did was wrong.

It was certainly against the rules. I'm not so sure it was wrong.

replies(1): >>Waterl+Ab
◧
2. Waterl+Ab[view] [source] 2021-10-13 00:51:44
>>Angost+(OP)
If I broke into your home tonight to play a prank on you and then handed you a white paper about how to better secure it, how would you feel?
replies(2): >>Natura+bd >>GreenW+G32
◧◩
3. Natura+bd[view] [source] [discussion] 2021-10-13 01:04:58
>>Waterl+Ab
Breaking and entering vs. playing a harmless video at the end of the day in school.

False equivalence.

replies(1): >>Waterl+Tp
◧◩◪
4. Waterl+Tp[view] [source] [discussion] 2021-10-13 03:14:00
>>Natura+bd
Unlawful access to a computer network is often a far more serious crime with stiffer penalties.

So perhaps you’re right that it is a false equivalence.

replies(1): >>teddyh+gO
◧◩◪◨
5. teddyh+gO[view] [source] [discussion] 2021-10-13 07:36:07
>>Waterl+Tp
Now you’re reverting to the “it’s against the rules” stance again.
◧◩
6. GreenW+G32[view] [source] [discussion] 2021-10-13 16:21:08
>>Waterl+Ab
except in the case of my home all my doors were unlocked. I would definitely appreciate a paper about how to secure my home, especially if the intruder took great care not to cause any damage or disturbance.
[go to top]