zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. croes+(OP)[view] [source] 2021-10-12 13:28:13
Hololens 1 and Magic Leap don't have much of a difference. The Magic Leap has a greater FOV
replies(1): >>buster+Pd
2. buster+Pd[view] [source] 2021-10-12 14:38:21
>>croes+(OP)
And yet ML had to raise almost $5B to get to around ballpark with the Hololens which I assure you Microsoft invested substantially less money into and already has tens of billions in government contracts committed to use the thing.
replies(1): >>leetro+c51
◧◩
3. leetro+c51[view] [source] [discussion] 2021-10-12 18:50:54
>>buster+Pd
What they could do, if they figure out the right play, with the right hardware, is make this a really compelling active entertainment device. You already saw haw popular Pokemon Go was... I think locking eyeballs to locations has VC's interested.
replies(1): >>tsimio+Nb1
◧◩◪
4. tsimio+Nb1[view] [source] [discussion] 2021-10-12 19:25:18
>>leetro+c51
Yes, but Pokemon Go was popular because it was on a phone you already had, because it was an extremely popular franchise, and because of the good luck of being a fad at the right time.

Nothing else took its place, and, while still being popular, it quickly faded from the status of global phenomenon.

It's a nice money making game, but not a hardware seller.

replies(1): >>tdeck+TI1
◧◩◪◨
5. tdeck+TI1[view] [source] [discussion] 2021-10-12 22:41:26
>>tsimio+Nb1
Most people I knew who played Pokemon Go quickly turned off the AR feature anyway.
[go to top]